Chitkara Open Access Journals - Blog

Applying Addie Model To Evaluate Faculty Development Program

Addie Model To Evaluate Faculty


We exist in a technology era where everything is controlled via electronic devices and education is also highly impacted by ICT (Information and Communication Technology) tools (Bates, 2000). The present study is an attempt to highlight the training need analysis approach and its applicability. Further, it focuses on the application of information and communication technology tools to analyze the data patterns during training need. ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation) approach has been chosen to explore the correlation between techniques/ approaches of training need analysis and evaluation of the training program for n=100. The respondents have been surveyed to express their views on five levels of the ADDIE Model. Further, an association has been explored between the demographics of trainers and the design & development process of the training programs.


Atul Bamrara


ADDIE, Instructional Design, Training, In-Service, SPSS



  • Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data: Quantitative applications in the social sciences. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 55(1), 193-196.
  • Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. J. (1997). Teacher pay and teacher quality. WE Upjohn Institute.
  • Bates, A. W. (2000). Managing Technological Change: Strategies for College and University Leaders. The Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 350 Sansome St., San Francisco, CA 94104.
  • Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1994). Quantitative data analysis for social scientists, Rev. Taylor & Frances/Routledge.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of teacher education, 51(3), 166-173.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education policy analysis archives, 8, 1.
  • Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2006). The systematic design of instruction.
  • Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively?. Computers & Education, 51(1), 187-199.
  • Dyer, C., Choksi, A., Awasty, V., Iyer, U., Moyade, R., Nigam, N., & Sheth, S. (2004). Knowledge for teacher development in India: the importance of ‘local knowledge’ for in-service education. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(1), 39-52.
  • Husen, T., Saha, L. J., & Noonan, R. (1978). Teacher Training and Student Achievement in Less Developed Counties. World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 310.
  • Gagne, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1974). Principles of instructional design. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). What is instructional design. Trends and issues in instructional design and technology, 16-25.
  • Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M. (1998). Designing effective instruction. Columbus, Ohio, EEUU.
  • Kruse, K. (2002). Introduction to instructional design and the ADDIE model. Retrieved January, 26, 2005.
  • Peterson, C. (2003). Bringing ADDIE to life: Instructional design at its best. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(3), 227-241.
  • Raina, V. K. (1995). Teacher educators in India: in search of an identity. Journal of teacher education, 46(1), 45-52.
  • Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1999). Instructional design (p. 3). New York: Wiley.
  • Tondeur, Jo, Johan Van Braak, and Martin Valcke. “Curricula and the use of ICT in education: Two worlds apart?.” British Journal of Educational Technology 38.6 (2007): 962-976.
  • Wastiau, P., Blamire, R., Kearney, C., Quittre, V., Van de Gaer, E., & Monseur, C. (2013). The use of ICT in education: a survey of schools in Europe. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 11-27.