Chitkara Open Access Journals - Blog

Roles of Exogenous Technologies in Vehicle Innovation: Cases from a Japan’s Automotive Parts Manufacturing Firm

Author(s):

  • Masahiro NakagawaTokyo City University, Japan
  • Chihiro WatanabeUniversity of Jyvaskyla, Finland

Keywords:

Technological innovation, technology spillover, exogenous technology, motor vehicle industry, Japan, automotive manufacturing

Abstract:

This paper explores the roles of technological innovations in the growth of Japan’s motor vehicle industry, mainly from technology spillover perspective from the early 2000s to today. An empirical analysis focusing on business performances, R&D investments, and patent applications taking a noteworthy unique case in Japan was attempted. Empirical analyses on the productivity of patent to technology stock, use of exogenous technologies for their own technological innovation on its Automotive Business Unit elucidated that innovation capabilities, incorporation of exogenous technologies, and profit generation makes a virtuous cycle of continuous technological innovation. Furthermore, we found that the range of technology spillovers is not only expanding along with the development of information communication technology but also superposing itself intricately between organizational (industry– firm–business unit) layers.

URL:

https://tmg.chitkara.edu.in/index.php/tmge/article/view/30/18

References:

Arora, A., Cohen, W.M., Walsh, J.P. (2016). The acquisition and commercialization of invention in American manufacturing: Incident and impact. Research Policy 45 (6) 113-1128. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.02.005.

Bartel, A., Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K. (2007). How does information technology affect productivity? Plant-level comparisons of product innovation, process improvement and worker skills. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (4) 1721-1758. https://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ qjec.2007.122.4.1721.

Battke, B. Schmit, T.S., Sitollenwerk, S., Hoffmann, F.H. (2016). Internal and external spillovers–Which kind of knowledge is more likely to flow within or across technologies. Research Policy 45 (1) 27-41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.014.

Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Lokshin, B. (2004). Cooperative R&D and company performance. Research Policy 33 (10) 1477-1492. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003.

Beneito, P. (2006). The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models. Research Policy 35 (4) 502-517. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.007

Bergek A., Berggren C., KITE Research Group (2014). The impact of environmental policy instruments on innovation: A Review of energy and AMB industry studies. Ecological Economics 106 112-123. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.07.016.

Bernstein, J. I. (1988). Costs of production, intra- and interindustry R&D spillovers: Canadian evidence. The Canadian Journal of Economics 21 (2) 324-347.

Bloom, N., Schankerman, M., Van Reenen, J. (2013). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica 81 (4) 1347-1393.

Chesbrough, H.W. (2003). Open innovation. Massachusetts, MA: Harvard Business School.